The reason why LGBT marriage needs to be accepted by the public

intellectual conservatism

As we know LGBT stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. People who choose to be LGBT divided into two types. Some of them are still ashamed to admit their sexual orientation status. But some have also been very open and brave to show their real identity. In terms of tradition and religion, we all know that this is something inappropriate. There are many things to think about.

Letting the LGBT couple get married means changing the existing traditions.

In fact, the community also has a different response in responding to the LGBT marriage. Some people choose to be conservative. These people think that LGBT couple should not get married. Marriage is something sacred that must be done by men and women. But there are also groups of people who allow this to happen. They assume that marriage is something that is based on love and not about gender.

intellectual conservatism
intellectual conservatism

As a society, we must think both the positive and negative sides. A change in the social structures certainly has a good impact and a bad impact. If it is felt that it gives too many bad effects, then we can disagree with the regulations of allowing LGBT couple to get married . But if that doesn’t hurt anyone and the rule has a good impact on society. Why should we disagree?
These are some of the reasons why LGBT marriage should be accepted by the public.

Prohibit LGBT marriage can cause social discrimination

When a person is forbidden to do what he wants, then obviously he will feel discriminated against his will. In marriage, everyone actually experience the same feeling. Every married couple will experience sadness and happiness during marriage life. Marriage is about being one and always there for each other’s joys and sorrows. Not allowing LGBT couple to get married will hurt these people’s feelings. They certainly want to demand equality.

LGBT couple can be a good parent

As we know, there are many heterosexual couples out there who don’t want to have children. There are also many heterosexual couples out there who cannot educate their children well. LGBT couples are couples who are considered good at being parents. According to research, LGBT couples who decide to adopt children successfully educate their children to become someone with a high level of intellectual.

Affect divorce rates

LGBT couples tend to be more lasting. This is because so many of them have struggled with their sexual orientation. LGBT people have struggled from social discrimination. They must be working hard in maintaining the relationship they have. That is why the LGBT couple tends to never have a big problem with their marriage. Conversely, heterosexual marriages have a high divorce rate. There are also many reasons why heterosexual couple choose to be divorce. It is totally opposite to the married life of LGBT couples who seem harmonious.

Affect divorce rates
Affect divorce rates

There will be no stereotypes about gender roles

It is undeniable that so far, gender roles are something inherent in society. Many people think that gender has a strong relationship with roles in the household. For example, men play the role of people who work. Women act as people who take care of the house and cook. If the LGBT marriage takes place, gender roles are no longer something to worry about. Men can do the role of women, and women can do the role of men. Even in heterosexual marriages, gender role may not be overly thought out, but in reality gender role still exists in society.

Helps increase the confidence of people with different sexual orientation

During this time people who are in a relationship with the same sex feel a lot of pressure. They are sometimes ashamed to admit their status. They also sometimes feel unprepared to say that to the public. Not accepting your own identity can make you stress. If we are more open and accept the differences, the world will be more harmonious. That is one of the reasons why the LGBT symbol is symbolized by a rainbow. A world with many colors is more beautiful rather than world with heterochromatic color. By accepting differences, we also help increase the confidence of these LGBT people.

increase the confidence of people
increase the confidence of people

From some of the points above we can conclude that LGBT also has the same rights as other people. Lgbt is a person’s sexual orientation. Being lgbt or heterosexual is actually the same thing. Although it sounds a bit different and reaps a lot of cons at first, we have to realize that LGBT marriage doesn’t hurt anyone. Besides LGBT also has the same rights as heterosexual people, LGBT marriage in fact also has a lot of positive impacts on society. Especially the LGBT couple can adopt and educate children well, this will certainly be very helpful for children who do not have a decent life.

Feminism in the French Revolution
Blog Events Phoenix Photos

Feminism in the French Revolution

Feminism in the French Revolution. The French Revolution is one of the most influential things in history. The French Revolution is a political upheaval between the royal family and the people. At the time of the French Revolution, the absolute monarchy that had survived for centuries was destroyed in less than 3 years. This is caused by a massive uprising and the failure of the government in preventing the movement of its people. At that time the Catholic Church was also overthrown because it had an understanding that the people did not want. The people also initiated a new idea, namely freedom equality and brotherhood.

Feminism in the French
Feminism in the French

In the 18th century, France experienced unpleasant things.

France experienced severe famine due to liberalism at that time. In the 18th century there was a lot of looting and rebellion everywhere. At that time life in France was very chaotic. Ordinary people and bourgeois have very, very different lives. The bourgeoisie can squander money to feast on shopping and dadu online gambling, while the ordinary people struggling so hard just to eat. Even at that time the French people could not eat bread because the price of bread was too expensive. The price of 1 bread is equivalent to 1 week of their salary.

This social inequality then caused women in France to march Versailles in October. This revolt was the first thing that led to the emergence of the French revolution. The women in Paris walked to Versailles because they rejected the system imposed by King Louis XVI. At that time King Louis ordered all the people to pay a large tax. This causes many people to fall into poverty. Because people are poor they cannot buy basic necessities such as food. The people have spent their money paying taxes, so buying bread alone is very expensive for them. People in France were lived miserably. The system was initially established because France had a large debt to Britain. By continuing to dredge the wealth of the people, the French people were starving more and more. While the palace dwellers could still live happily and peacefully.

Feminism in the French
Feminism in the French

In October, the women who demonstrated were feminists.

They are women who fight for their rights. In the 18th century women were seen as insignificant. They are considered useless. Therefore, women do not have political rights and rights as active citizens at the time. Their voices have never been heard and they have no chance to voice opinions in the public.

At that time these women demonstrated in the palace of Versailles because they wanted to get decent food. But because it was ignored, the woman then started looting in the Paris area. This caused even greater chaos. These women confiscated wheat harvests, looted bread in shops, and kidnapped local officials. They want an even food supply. They hope the price of bread does not soar and everyone can eat properly.

Feminism in the French
Feminism in the French

The French Revolution then ended when King Louis XVI was sentenced to death by beheading. Kin Louis XVI death shows that the people have won. The government in the form of an absolute monarchy then changed to a government in the form of a republic.

Three Pioneers and Their Views in Gender Conservatism
Blog Events Phoenix Photos

Three Pioneers and Their Views in Gender Conservatism

Three Pioneers and Their Views in Gender Conservatism. The world has seen massive change when it comes to gender equality. However, traces of patriarchy are still prominent in today’s society even among younger generations. It is not difficult to see why that might be the case. For centuries, people have lived with such conservative philosophy. Many infamous philosophers had actually contributed to this point of view. You might be surprised to know that the three infamous Greek philosophers Aristotle, Hippocrates, and Plato are among the biggest contributors to this school of thought.

Three Pioneers and
Three Pioneers

Plato is often said to be a pioneer in conservatism about gender. The philosopher had theorized about the creation of mankind which can still be read in several philosophy books. In his dadu online theory about human creation, it is very clear how Plato believed that women are less wholesome creations than men. He mentioned that women are not fully capable to think within reasons. Women are considered to have different characteristics (and therefore virtues).  Thus, Plato said that reunion between man and woman is important to complete each other.

Plato’s opinions are adapted by his students and their followers.

Hippocrates, with his medical background, delved deeper into the physical difference between man and woman. It is clear that there is glaring anatomy difference between the two. Woman owns uterus and therefore capable of giving birth to new life. This ability was highlighted, but unfortunately not framed in fair manner. Hippocrates explained that giving birth is the ultimate way a woman can contribute to the society. This interpretation of woman’s nature affects how society treats women.

Three Pioneers and
physical difference between man and woman

Aristotle’s view on gender roles was more related to political aspects of a society. He considered that women should be led by man because they are incapable of making sound decisions. Women are thought to be easily affected by their own emotions and can act impulsive. He did not think that it is necessary for women to receive similar education as men, a view that was dissimilar to Plato’s. However, he emphasized the importance of happiness for women too in order to build a utopian society. A society will not be able to thrive if its women are unhappy. Still, women are put in a lower power position than men.

Conservative gender philosophy from these philosophers really reflects the society.

Even in modern era. Wherever you live, you can easily see people who adopt “man as the ultimate leader” perspective. There are more male leaders than the females all around the globe, whether in government or corporate sector. Various issues stem from this particular discourse. Wage gap between men and women is something that is still present in modern society. Women notoriously receive less pay than men despite occupying similar positions and have equal qualifications. This philosophy is also reflected in the way that workplace regulations are not friendly towards women.

Three Pioneers and
Conservative gender philosophy

The philosophy itself became wide spreading to other regions due to occupancy. That is why the three philosophers and their view in gender conservatism become familiar to us.  Changing mindsets that have been cultivated for years would be a difficult challenge. As the society continues to change and contest the old norms, though, the efforts to rethink old gender conservatism are encouraged.

Learning Conservatism Through Fictional Works of Famous Authors
Blog Events Phoenix

Learning Conservatism Through Fictional Works of Famous Authors

Learning Conservatism Through Fictional Works of Famous Authors. Fictional literature world is continuously expanding as the era is progressing. Currently, there are more forms of fictional literature that people can enjoy.  In the past, hardbound novels and textbooks were the two main ways for people to enjoy literary works. Nowadays, people can read digital magazines, fan fiction, or even posts on social media to get their daily literature dose. The essences within those works are also varied. Since freedom of contents is “hit” these days, you can easily find fictional literature works that break regular boundaries. Nonetheless, conservatism can still be found in literature.

Learning Conservatism
Learning Conservatism

What makes a literature considered to be conservative? It will be easier to understand the meaning of conservatism first. This particular philosophy emphasizes the application of traditional structure within the context of society. Such application encompasses various aspects in life: human relations, religions, political view, et cetera. The main objective of this philosophy is to achieve longevity and stability in the society. Conservative fictional literature will tend to have theme such as retribution and traditional social roles.

Learning Conservatism
Learning Conservatism

Does that mean that conservative fictions are not fun? That is totally incorrect.

You might not know this but the author of infamous Lord of the Rings series, J. R. R. Tolkien, was a conservative writer. His traditional philosophy could be seen clearly in his writings. He favored the quest of fundamental truths in his works. If you have read his novels, you might be able to see the conflicts between the inner and overt selves of his characters. In addition, Tolkien himself was a devout Catholic. Thus, he would introduce some religious themes into his novels.

Learning Conservatism
Learning Conservatism

Another famous writer slash conservative philosopher would be Nathaniel Hawthorne. He notoriously wrote The Scarlet Letter which becomes a must-read fictional work in various literature curriculums. Study of human natures in his works was rather prevalent. The author particularly highlighted the less desirable quality of human such as immorality, shame, and evil. You can see that the conflicts within oneself was apparent and that would be ended in a final resolution where redemption for those sins was made.

Female authors also provided significant contribution to the conservative fictional literature.

One of them is Flannery O’Connor whom throughout her life had written numerous novels and essays with her known style, Southern Gothic. You might expect a female traditional writer to have soft and feminine touch in her works. However, this author often depicted violent situations in which her characters were thrown into. In those difficult situations, the characters would face internal and external conflicts that would affect their lives forever. The common theme of her works would be acceptance of human natures. As an example, her work entitled The Violent Bear It Away ended with the main character accepting his fate as a prophet. The character then embarked on journey to fulfill that faith.

If you are interested in learning about conservatism but in interesting format, reading fictional works written by traditionalists would become an interesting experience. There are many other interesting writers from different periods whose works reflect conservative point of view.

The Differences between the Conservative and Revolutionary
Blog Events Phoenix

The Differences between the Conservative and Revolutionary

The Differences between the Conservative and Revolutionary. These two terms sound interesting and relevant to be discussed in the national context. This term describes the nature and character of a change that is being carried out by a country. They are also becoming the model of the movement for change that is carried by each power and social-political group in a nation.

Conservatives

Conservatives are political attitudes and behaviors that do not want any meaningful (fundamental) change in a system. This attitude is usually adopted by those who are enjoying a privileged position of power in a structure or at least feel very benefited by the existing system. They are generally the financiers, authorities, lickers, and accomplices of a regime.

The Differences between
The Differences between

The conservatives are few but they are the dominant force in a country’s socio-political system. It is they who then control and run the state power system to reap profits and enjoy power.

To make their power last long, conservatives are more likely to maintain and preserve existing systems.

Even if they make changes because of insistence and outside encouragement by the opposition groups. They only want the changes not to completely shift or eliminate their position in power. Even then, the change is only possible if the situation is already. Very crisis and urgent which forces them to step down from positions of power.

The Differences between
The Differences between

That could have happened if the resistance movement was so strong, massive, and organized in a nation. Changes like this that have happened in this country when the new order regime was overthrown by the student movement supported by scholars and the masses of the people.

However, these changes have not brought significant changes to the life of bola 88 society and the progress of the nation until today. Because conservatives are back in power and are entrenched in our state system.

Revolutionary

Unlike the conservative term, revolutionary is a situation of massive and fundamental changes in a constitutional system. So the revolutionaries are very at odds with those who are conservative. Revolutionaries are generally those who feel oppressed, exploited, and betrayed by rulers who are positioned as conservatives.

The revolutionaries are not only from the oppressed workers, peasants, and fishermen, but also intellectuals and middle class who have an ideological awareness to make fundamental changes in a system. Those who are intellectual and middle class have a strategic role to spearhead, organize, agitate, and encourage the masses in taking the fight.

The Differences between
The Differences between

It’s just that intellectual figures, scholars, and middle-class people are very rare in the socio-political context of our nation today. The intellectuals and middle-class people are now generally conservative, who only work as craftsmen, supporters, and even sycophants of the regime.

The intellectuals and revolutionary middle-class figures existed only in the history. Of our independence decades ago and the others are revolutionary figures from intellectuals. Scholars, and middle-class who want to fight the Dutch company to free the nation from the process of oppression and colonialism.

Such revolutionary figures have been lost in the life of our nation. What remains is only those who are pragmatic, opportunistic, and conservative. The generation of fighters as before seemed to be interrupted by the currents and changing times.

5 World’s Most Famous Conservative Leaders Today
Blog Events Phoenix Photos

5 World’s Most Famous Conservative Leaders Today

5 World’s Most Famous Conservative Leaders Today. There are several political ideologies in the world, they are Liberals, Conservatives, Centrists, and Communists. Today, there are many conservative world leaders. These leaders make policies that are quite anti-liberal and they are also very influential people in the world. They lead the big countries in the world so that everyone will be reluctant to them. Who are the 5 most conservative leaders in the world? Check these following reviews.

Vladimir Putin

In the first position on this list is Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin is the president of the Russian state. Putin also just won back the Russian presidential election. Vladimir Putin was also named by Forbes to be the most influential leader in the world. He is a Conservative. Russia People’s Front which has the ideology of National Conservatism and Putinism. He has also issued various conservative policies and one of them is the anti-gay law which makes Russia one of the most assertive countries against Gay. Putin also makes relations between the state and the orthodox church get closer.

5 World's Most
5 World’s Most

Theresa May

Next, we have Theresa May. Theresa May was the prime minister of the British empire. She came from and was also the leader of the British Conservative Party who had the ideology of conservatism. Theresa May was also a right-wing politician like Russia, the United States, and Austria. Britain is a country that is pro-LGBT and Muslim immigrants.

Theresa May
Theresa May

Sebastian Kurz

Next is Sebastian Kurz. Maybe this name is not so familiar to you Sebastian Kurz is the Chancellor of Austria. Kurz is the youngest world leader because at the age of only 31, he becomes Chancellor and at the age of 27 he has become the foreign minister. young European leaders are usually liberal, but Kurz is different because he is a Conservative. He is from the Austrian People’s Party which has the ideology of Christian Democracy and Conservatism. Sebastian Kurz also made various Conservative policies such as anti-immigration policies, restricting refugees, and anti-Islamic policies such as stopping mosque funding.

Theresa May
Theresa May

Angela Merkel

Angela Merkel is a German Chancellor (like Prime Minister / Vice President). Angela Merkel has been a German Chancellor since 2005 or has been 13 years. Although Merkel is conservative, the German state does not immediately become Conservative at poker uang asli because the President, Frank Walter is a centrist – liberal (center right) which makes Germany finally legalize LGBT marriages that were previously not legalized.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the president of the United States. Donald Trump is also a politician from the Republican Party who has the National Conservatism ideology. Trump is also included in the ranks of the most conservative president in the US. Trump also issued various conservative policies aimed at returning the US to a conservative country as before led by Obama because, during Obama’s leadership, many liberal policies imposed by Obama were not in accordance with the values ​​of US conservatism. Some of Trump’s policies were anti-abortion policies, tax cuts, and rejecting LGBT.  In this Trump era, he also promised to restore Christian power to America as it should.