As we know LGBT stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. People who choose to be LGBT divided into two types. Some of them are still ashamed to admit their sexual orientation status. But some have also been very open and brave to show their real identity. In terms of tradition and religion, we all know that this is something inappropriate. There are many things to think about.
Letting the LGBT couple get married means changing the existing traditions.
In fact, the community also has a different response in responding to the LGBT marriage. Some people choose to be conservative. These people think that LGBT couple should not get married. Marriage is something sacred that must be done by men and women. But there are also groups of people who allow this to happen. They assume that marriage is something that is based on love and not about gender.
As a society, we must think both the positive and negative sides. A change in the social structures certainly has a good impact and a bad impact. If it is felt that it gives too many bad effects, then we can disagree with the regulations of allowing LGBT couple to get married . But if that doesn’t hurt anyone and the rule has a good impact on society. Why should we disagree?
These are some of the reasons why LGBT marriage should be accepted by the public.
Prohibit LGBT marriage can cause social discrimination
When a person is forbidden to do what he wants, then obviously he will feel discriminated against his will. In marriage, everyone actually experience the same feeling. Every married couple will experience sadness and happiness during marriage life. Marriage is about being one and always there for each other’s joys and sorrows. Not allowing LGBT couple to get married will hurt these people’s feelings. They certainly want to demand equality.
LGBT couple can be a good parent
As we know, there are many heterosexual couples out there who don’t want to have children. There are also many heterosexual couples out there who cannot educate their children well. LGBT couples are couples who are considered good at being parents. According to research, LGBT couples who decide to adopt children successfully educate their children to become someone with a high level of intellectual.
Affect divorce rates
LGBT couples tend to be more lasting. This is because so many of them have struggled with their sexual orientation. LGBT people have struggled from social discrimination. They must be working hard in maintaining the relationship they have. That is why the LGBT couple tends to never have a big problem with their marriage. Conversely, heterosexual marriages have a high divorce rate. There are also many reasons why heterosexual couple choose to be divorce. It is totally opposite to the married life of LGBT couples who seem harmonious.
There will be no stereotypes about gender roles
It is undeniable that so far, gender roles are something inherent in society. Many people think that gender has a strong relationship with roles in the household. For example, men play the role of people who work. Women act as people who take care of the house and cook. If the LGBT marriage takes place, gender roles are no longer something to worry about. Men can do the role of women, and women can do the role of men. Even in heterosexual marriages, gender role may not be overly thought out, but in reality gender role still exists in society.
Helps increase the confidence of people with different sexual orientation
During this time people who are in a relationship with the same sex feel a lot of pressure. They are sometimes ashamed to admit their status. They also sometimes feel unprepared to say that to the public. Not accepting your own identity can make you stress. If we are more open and accept the differences, the world will be more harmonious. That is one of the reasons why the LGBT symbol is symbolized by a rainbow. A world with many colors is more beautiful rather than world with heterochromatic color. By accepting differences, we also help increase the confidence of these LGBT people.
From some of the points above we can conclude that LGBT also has the same rights as other people. Lgbt is a person’s sexual orientation. Being lgbt or heterosexual is actually the same thing. Although it sounds a bit different and reaps a lot of cons at first, we have to realize that LGBT marriage doesn’t hurt anyone. Besides LGBT also has the same rights as heterosexual people, LGBT marriage in fact also has a lot of positive impacts on society. Especially the LGBT couple can adopt and educate children well, this will certainly be very helpful for children who do not have a decent life.
The Emerging Neo Socialism Among Four Generations (Baby Boomer, Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z). The results of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. A non-profit organization, show an increasing number of young people or millennial in the United States who agree with Communism and Socialism http://184.108.40.206.
The foundation, based in Washington DC, discovered the fact that millennial or those who will vote in the 2020 elections are more inclined towards Communism than Capitalism.
Reported by Marketwatch.com, Monday (11/04/2019), the study showed that more than a third of the millennial surveyed approved of Communism.
This figure has expanded from the earlier year. In 2018, there was just 28 percent who consented to Socialism. Casualties of Socialism Commemoration Establishment’s official chief Marion Smith said she was astonished at the aftereffects of the investigation.
“Verifiable amnesia about the risks of socialism and communism is introduced in the current year’s report.” Smith said in an announcement on Monday (10/28/2019).
“At the point when we don’t teach youngsters about the chronicled truth that 100 million casualties. Were executed on account of the socialist system during the previous century. We need not be amazed by their ability to grasp Marxist thoughts,” he included.
The study also reported that 22 percent of millennial believe. “Society will be better off if all private property is abolished,” according to the ideas of modern communists.
While 45 percent of Generation Z and millennial believe that “All higher education must be free.” Which is also a program of struggle for communists and socialists. This opinion has emerged as a result of the high price their parents must pay to get them educated and the struggle they see behind it.
What Cause the Socialism Tendency Among Millenial and Gen X?
The answer is pretty simple. Gen X, who were born between 1965 and 1979 are currently the most productive people by age. Most of them have seen and suffered from none other than the consequences of harsh capitalism.
Generation Z and millennial, however. Has a bigger concern because they are prone to suffer from family malfunction due to economic distress. However, according to research and experts, both generations, especially, Gen Z cannot have this idea alone. They are the motor of the idea that is most likely to be created by Gen X.
Another Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation study also shows, American youths tend to lose faith in Capitalism and prefer Socialism. According to Axios.com, the foundation examines more than 2 thousand Americans aged 16 years and over. Mentioned, 70 percent of millennial will elect a Socialist leader.
The survey says that nearly half of Gen Z (born 1995-2010) and millennial respondents feel the United States’ economic system is working against them.
Because they grow in a capitalist country where economic inequality continues to increase. They are burdened by debt, small wage increases, and threatened with losing their jobs.
The study showed 19 percent of millennial and 12 percent of Gen Z thought the Communist Manifesto “More guarantees freedom and equality for all” than the US Declaration of Independence.
Meanwhile, only 2 percent of baby boomers (born 1946-1964) and 5 percent of Gen X (born 1965-1980) feel the same way.
Senate Sanders and His Idea of Neo Socialism. Instead of prosperity, the word ‘capitalism’ is now attached to the financial crisis that makes the future of American youths bleak. They look for alternatives and find socialism as some sort of a new way of living in the United States.
Bernie Sanders never bothered the notion that he was the “old man” in the Democratic elite circle. He decided that he would go ahead in the United States Presidential Election 2020.
The senator from the state of Vermont must first win in the internal Democratic Party competition. Three years ago he explored the same process, and unfortunately lost to Hillary Cilnton.
Lauren Gambuni and Tom McCharty from the Guardian report that Sanders is now dealing with other younger politicians. An example is Sanders’ closest friend at congress, Elizabeth Warren, state senator of Massachusetts.
Other senators who became his rivals include Kamala Harris from California, Cory Booker from New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand from New York, and Amy Klobuchar from Minnesota.
Other Figures with Similar Idea
Outside the status of senator, whose name is no more popular, there is Pete Buttigieg as Mayor of South Bend, Indiana. There are also competitors with exorbitant reputations. Two of them are old enough: former vice president Joe Bidden and billionaire Michael Bloomberg.
Especially for young senators, some of whom are women. Some others have colored skin. These criteria, according to analysts, attract the attention of the most recent liberal young generation-SJW (Social Justice Warrior).
But Sanders is popular not because of identity politics http://220.127.116.11. He was hailed by the younger generation in the US because it was consistent in the left-wing spectrum, more precisely the socialist-democratic platform who for several years have been a great opposition for the current government. This gives the idea of the newly emerging socialism among politicians in the United States of America.
The young candidates mentioned above have won sympathy for campaigning for progressive policies. Some of them were inspired by the model of governance in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden).
For example Medicare fo All, a universal health service system. Or raise the federal minimum wage to $ 15 per hour, free access to higher education, fight global warming more aggressively by arranging global trade contracts, and implementing progressive taxes for citizens with extremely high net worth.
Furthermore, Sanders has talked about it on campuses and the public political stage for the past three decades so far.
“Three years back, during the 2016 campaign battle, when we conveyed the four dynamic plans, the thoughts were considered ‘radical’ and ‘outrageous’. Indeed, three years have passed.
Sanders first announced his candidacy at the 2020 Presidential Election in an interview with Vermont Public Radio. On the same occasion he revealed plans to attack Donald Trump during the campaign.
Foreign Interventions in Intercountry Problems. Intervention is the intervention of a third party in a dispute between two parties. Intervention often refers to solving a problem to get a win-win-solution. The basic principle of intervention is problem-solving through deliberation or other relevant action.
The third party
Third parties play an important role in the success of the intervention. These third parties usually have a higher position or influence compared to the two warring parties. Basically, these third parties will mediate the problems experienced by the parties to the conflict. However, in some cases (especially in country or political matters), third parties will show partiality for one party. This alignment is based on an assessment of right/wrong, closeness to one party, or political and economic benefits.
America, for decades, has intervened in various political/economic problems in various countries. This country is always present as an arbiter in various situations; some produce good resolution and some only trigger more serious problems. American intervention and alignments in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one example of a major failure.
Interventions by third parties should be conducted based on the common good. The intervention must consider the security and sovereignty aspects of the warring countries.
The ideal intervention
Alignments may be done based on the common good (to determine the right and wrong parties). Alignments based on the political or economic interests of one of the parties will only make the problem worse. Interventions should be conducted by neutral parties; parties that do not have any interests or favor one.
International law strictly prohibits a country from interfering in the affairs of other countries (without going through a clear process). The United Nations is one of the global forums that can be used by a country to get a solution or support from other countries.
The intervention process usually begins with providing support and assistance. Furthermore, support and assistance can escalate into interventions if the aid provider sees a worsening situation or conditions that are not as expected. In this case, the donor country may intervene on both sides to immediately resolve the dispute. One of the highest forms of intervention is the provision of military support.
A stronger country will usually start everything with the help of logistics to the military. Without intervention from other countries, a country with humanitarian problems might lose more people and the problem will destroy that country over time.
Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions in Hospital Services. In the world of nursing, intervention refers to a nursing plan. Interventions were implemented to provide the best medical services and care for the patient’s recovery. Interventions were also carried out to determine the specific needs of the patient. Each patient certainly has a variety of backgrounds that will determine the intervention given.
Determinants of nursing orders
One of the main times that determine nursing plans or interventions is the type and severity of the disease. Each patient comes to the health center with their respective conditions. Before carrying out the intervention, medical personnel will make observations and examinations to determine the patient’s condition. After that, they will determine what medical actions will be given to the patient.
The results of examinations and observations cannot necessarily be used to intervene in medical treatment. Medical personnel must also consider the economic factors of the patient. Each patient has a different economic ability where, whether we like it or not, will determine the nursing intervention that will be provided. A hospital certainly cannot provide health services that are more than the patient’s economic ability to avoid financial losses. The hospital will certainly maximize the intervention following the financial ability of the patient.
Besides, the availability of medical personnel and equipment also determines the nursing intervention that will be given to a patient. Nursing interventions that will be given to a patient will be adjusted to existing medical personnel and equipment. Unfavorability of equipment and medical personnel requires a hospital to refer the patient to another hospital.
Another aspect that also determines nursing orders is family consent. The patient’s family must know and agree to every detail of the plan or intervention that will be given to the patient. This was done to avoid any lawsuits that might result from the interventions provided.
The principle of nursing intervention
Nursing interventions are designed to provide the best service that refers to healing or putting patients in the best health conditions they can get. Interventions must be carried out carefully to avoid the possibility of malpractice that can be fatal to both the patient and the medical staff and the hospital concerned.
The intervention must also facilitate the implementation of care from the hospital to the patient. Interventions are not only tailored to the patient’s condition but also the ability of the medical personnel. Hospitals must consider optimizing medical personnel services for all patients, not only for certain patients. Medical staff must be able to carry out effective and efficient nursing interventions to reach all patients in the hospital.
Effective and efficient nursing orders will produce good and optimal medical services http://18.104.22.168. Medical personnel will work according to the plan (with some minor adjustments according to the development of the patient’s condition). Patients will also get the best service according to some of the determinants mentioned earlier.
The basic principle of nursing intervention is objectivity, not subjectivity. Good nursing orders or interventions will make it easier for medical workers and patients to get the right and carry out their obligations in the right portion.
Factors that Caused the French Revolution to Occur. The motto— Liberte, egalite, fraternite (freedom, equality, and brotherhood), where do they exist? If your answer is the French Revolution, then you deserve a thumbs up. Taking you back to the past, this historic event occurred during the reign of Louis XVI in the 18th century (1789).
Why are we talking about revolution, the French revolution, in particular? Revolution is a social and cultural change that involves the main points of people’s lives and necessities. In the revolution itself, the changes that occur can be planned or unplanned and can be carried out without violence or through violence.
The occurrence of the French revolution is mainly caused by four factors— absolute power of the king, political injustice, economic crisis, and the emergence of new thinkers.
Absolute Power or Absolute Monarchy
- — Before the last king of France— Louis XVI, the previous king. Louis XIV has already brought the system of monarchy close to an end. Because the people could no longer stand the power of the monarchs and that. Must assume the king was right, then the French Revolution occurred. Thus, Louis XIV’s absolutism also got him involved in conflict with the Huguenots (the French Protestants) and the papacy (the bishops and authorities), with devastating consequences. To maintain his absolutism, he built the Bastille prison, intended for anyone who went against the king’s commands. Louis XIV’s absolutism was out of control because his power was not limited by law— l’etat c’est moi (I myself am the nation).
- — In political factors, the nobles made all the rules and were directly approved by the king. Thus, political injustice can be seen from the election of government employees who are based on the descendants (family factor) and not based on profession or expertise. The unlimited power of the nobles caused the state administration to be chaotic and resulted in acts of corruption. Another political injustice is the exclusion of the ordinary people from participating in any government activities.
- — The life of the previous king and royal nobles, as well as the consort of King Louis XVI. Named Maria Antoinette (known as Madame Déficit) who lived full of luxury and grandeur. Thus, she was the main reason for the economic crisis of the French country at that time. In addition, the inheritance of debts from King Louis XIV and Louis XV makes the state debt piled up even more.
- — The emergence of reforming philosophers also contributed to the outbreak of the French revolution. Their influence of understanding of rationalism and accepting the truth must be supported by reason. This understanding has led to a revival and humanism leading people to think freely to express their opinions. Therefore, these philosophers had a major influence on European society, including the leaders of French society. Three main reforming philosophers and their work include J. J Rousseau (Du Contract Social or the Community Agreement). John Locke (Two Treatises of Government or the teachings of popular sovereignty), and Montesquieu (L’es prit des Lois or The Spirit of the Laws).
In general, an event that changed the lives of French and European citizens. Known as the French Revolution, occurred in 1789. Thus, from absolutism to new thinkers, this revolution is able to influence and change the development of the other nations in the world.
An Outline of the 7 background of the French Revolution. It’s fascinating to know several revolutions that happened in the past are able to influence and change the development of countries in various aspects. One of them is the French Revolution. Which also played an important role in changing the world for better than before.
The French Revolution occurred in 1789 because King Louis XVI committed massive financial. Expenditures and political injustice in choosing a governmental board of members— the nobles took over the governmental force with no knowledge of the profession or skills. However, before that, the execution of absolute power and monarchy during the French Revolution achieved its glory during the reign of King Louis XIV somewhere in between the year of 1643-1715.
With all classes of people who rebelled against absolutism. So, on July 9, 1789 a body of Law was formed, known as the Constituent National Council or the Assembly of the National Constituent.
Meanwhile, what are the reasons behind the occurrence of the French Revolution? Due to several reasons, these are the 7 important outlines of the revolution, including:
- Bad Governance— Due to the absolute power of the king in France, turned almost everything into iniquity. The king has the absolute freedom to act arbitrarily. The king’s prominences are superior, while the needs of the people are set aside.
- The Void of the State Treasury— In 1789, during the reign of Louis XVI. The burden of the state was very heavy and on the verge of bankruptcy due to King Louis XIV inheritance. Thus leaving the country with debts that must be paid in tremendous numbers.
- Vacuum of Power— The power vacuum during the French Revolution was mainly because of a succession of governments with a series of failures.
- The Rise of Rationalism— The concept of rationalism emerged after the revival and humanism movements that opposed the authority of the church (18th century). Thus, understanding rationalism by all means is the source of all truth, so that anything that doesn’t make sense is considered incorrect.
- The Emergence of Romanticism— In connection to Rationalism, Romanticism is an understanding that upholds feelings and values human instincts. Thus, romanticism occurred when the rationalists were unable to complete their battle.
Injustice Due to Feudalism— The feudal system in France divides the society into three groups, including:
- the nobles with special rights and holds all power in the government.
- group of religious experts who are loyal to the king.
- trade groups, workers and ordinary people.
The Influence of the American Revolution—
Inspired by the success of the American Revolution, the French citizens became increasingly eager to fight for their freedom. Since, the political force of the American Revolution itself is driven by the idea of republicanism.
Therefore, the French Revolution became one of the important moments in the goal of abolishing the monarchical system. Thus, the emergence of new hopes and freedom makes the society feel safer and better in the long run.
Advantages of joint discussions in class. After the teacher gives the material, usually the teacher will give time for students to note or understand the material. But it does not stop there, some teachers usually invite students to hold discussions together in class to discuss the material just taught. This class discussion is obviously very useful for students so that they continue to follow their lessons and are motivated to understand the material just given.
Discussion is a normal activity. Discussions in class make students better understand the material by exchanging understanding with one another. If student A only understands the front part of the material, student B understands the middle part. And student C only understands only the end. By holding discussions together they will share their understanding so that their knowledge will be richer on material.
These are some of the reasons why class discussion is very good and useful for students;
Increase curiosity of students
Sometimes lessons are boring. Especially if the teacher explains with language that is too standard and using monotonous tone of speech. Class discussions will keep students’ focus awake. This is because they can be appointed at any time to provide a summary or understanding of the material just given. Discussions can also make students interested and out of curiosity with the understanding of classmates. So it can be concluded that class discussion can make students. Curious about the material and the understanding of their friends
Make teachers more active
In class discussions, it is undeniable that students will throw a question both to the teacher and their friends. Questions that are thrown at the teacher is usually about some parts that have not been clearly explained. While the question to friends is usually about why friends have different perspectives with our understanding. Here the teacher will become more active because the teacher will share more knowledge, the teacher will answer the details of the questions and explain the material more deeply. Beside this, the teacher will also play a more active role because she can rectify the opinions of friends who are incorrect.
Sharpen students’ speaking ability
In the discussion forum, it was clear that students would have the opportunity to talk. Even though not every meeting they meet, they get a chance. But if there is a consistent discussion http://22.214.171.124 which is held in every meeting for one semester, at least one student must have the opportunity to speak even only once. This means that a consistent discussion will make each student in the class talk about their opinions about the material being taught. By conducting this discussion all students will know how it feels to talk and express opinions. This action also prevents students in the class who are very quiet, students who are shy, students who like to disappear at any time. And students who like to fall asleep and students who like to play cellphones
The importance of learning debate in class. Debate can be held in terms of individual or group. Debate actually addresses a topic from 2 different points of view. This activity makes two parties duel with each other by giving reasons why they support or reject some ideas and maintaining their best opinion. Debates have many positive effects on students in class. While in reality, the actual debate can be done by everyone plus it has a good impact.
These are some of the reasons why debate is good for students.
Improve students’ critical thinking skills
Debate can be very helpful in terms of education. In facing any situation both academic and non-academic, students are required to have good critical thinking skills. In the debate there will be one topic to be discussed. Either being a Pro team or a contra team, both parties must think critically in order to get a logical and strong argument. Debates also usually have a time limit for thinking.
Improve the ability of public speaking
During a debate someone will express their opinions. Holding a debate will make students confident in their thinking abilities. These students will also feel confident with the opinions they produce themselves. Besides feeling confident, the debate also teaches students to have a persuasive manner.
Make students more confident in refuting something
In daily life, Have you ever felt disapproving of something but you are too shy to talk? Debates teach us more confidence and talk about the truth. Debate makes us confident in expressing our opinions. If we are accustomed to arguing in class, we will also be accustomed to find some faults or illogical idea proposed in people’s arguments. Debate indirectly teaches us to speak in public with our opinions and refute the opinions of others who are wrong
Helping students be better in making mind maps
Sometimes, we meet some friends in the class who are smart but can’t express their opinions well. Speaking requires skill. Through debate, someone can practice their way of speaking. Expressing opinions and arguments in a debate needs to be well-structured, such as starts with the background , then the real idnplay poker case, example and closing arguments. Learning debate makes a person accustomed to thinking and speaking in a structured way
Some of the reasons above illustrate how important debate is in the education system. To achieve a good debate, students must follow the rules and be consistent with the topic. Some tips for a good debate are to speak with an adequate tempo but clear and full of Charisma, speak with confidence, have a good body language, always note down opponents’ arguments, provide illustrations or analogies about the arguments made, and make a strong closing.
Marie antoinette teenager who became queen during the French Revolution. Marie Antoinette is a princess of Austria. She was born on November 2, 1755 and died on October 16, 1793 at the age of 37 years. When Marie Antoinette was a little girl, she always celebrated her birthday 1 day early. That happened because Marie Antoinette was born on the day that is considered by Catholics as a bad day.
During her childhood, Marie Antoinette also learned music from Amadeus Mozart. Marie Antoinette is known as someone who is less clever because she cannot master many languages which at that time every noble must be able to master more than one language. However, Marie Antoinette is known as someone who is good at playing harps, harpsichords and flutes. Besides being good at playing music, she also has a beautiful voice.
Marie Antoinette was married when she was 15 years old.
She was married to a King of France named Louis XVI. Initially the marriage of Marie and Louis was criticized by many people. Especially because they both came from two countries that had been hostile for a long time. In living the household Marie antoinette often feels uncomfortable and not ready. This is known from the many letters sent by Marie antoinette to her mother, Queen Maria Theresia of Hamburg.
As a teenager, Marie antoinette is known as a childish person.
She loves to live life as a socialite who lives in luxury. The attitude of Marie Antoinette is very contrary to the attitude of her husband, King Louis XIV. King Louis XIV is a very closed person, often consider slow in making a decision, and shy. King Louis XVI is known as someone who likes to read and forge iron. This is very contrary to Marie antoinette. The Queen loves to enjoy life with excitement and relax. She always makes gambling parties and shopping for expensive clothes.
Despite having a luxurious lifestyle, Marie antoinette is actually a kind person. Marie Antoinette once built a house for widows and unmarried women. Marie antoinette also visits and feeds poor families. She is selling royal goods which are no longer used to buy wheat and given to people in need. She also once paid the medicine of someone who had an accident and paid for the family until the person able to work at situs judi online again.
At the end of her life Marie Antoinette and her husband were both punished by the people.
Both of them were sentenced to death for failing as leaders. They were both kings and queens which caused France to be chaotic. Before being sentenced to death Marie Antoinette and Louis XIV were put in prison. The two of them then may not be called kings and queens anymore but are considered ordinary people. They both died by beheaded in front of the people. Marie Antoinette and King Louis XIV both felt that they really did not understand about being a leader. They don’t realize that they have big responsibilities. This is known from the prayers of King Louis and Marie Antoinette’s letter. King Louis XIV had prayed that God would help him lead because he was too young. While Marie Antoinette also often sent letters to her mother saying that she was not ready.
Feminism in the French Revolution. The French Revolution is one of the most influential things in history. The French Revolution is a political upheaval between the royal family and the people. At the time of the French Revolution, the absolute monarchy that had survived for centuries was destroyed in less than 3 years. This is caused by a massive uprising and the failure of the government in preventing the movement of its people. At that time the Catholic Church was also overthrown because it had an understanding that the people did not want. The people also initiated a new idea, namely freedom equality and brotherhood.
In the 18th century, France experienced unpleasant things.
France experienced severe famine due to liberalism at that time. In the 18th century there was a lot of looting and rebellion everywhere. At that time life in France was very chaotic. Ordinary people and bourgeois have very, very different lives. The bourgeoisie can squander money to feast on shopping and dadu online gambling, while the ordinary people struggling so hard just to eat. Even at that time the French people could not eat bread because the price of bread was too expensive. The price of 1 bread is equivalent to 1 week of their salary.
This social inequality then caused women in France to march Versailles in October. This revolt was the first thing that led to the emergence of the French revolution. The women in Paris walked to Versailles because they rejected the system imposed by King Louis XVI. At that time King Louis ordered all the people to pay a large tax. This causes many people to fall into poverty. Because people are poor they cannot buy basic necessities such as food. The people have spent their money paying taxes, so buying bread alone is very expensive for them. People in France were lived miserably. The system was initially established because France had a large debt to Britain. By continuing to dredge the wealth of the people, the French people were starving more and more. While the palace dwellers could still live happily and peacefully.
In October, the women who demonstrated were feminists.
They are women who fight for their rights. In the 18th century women were seen as insignificant. They are considered useless. Therefore, women do not have political rights and rights as active citizens at the time. Their voices have never been heard and they have no chance to voice opinions in the public.
At that time these women demonstrated in the palace of Versailles because they wanted to get decent food. But because it was ignored, the woman then started looting in the Paris area. This caused even greater chaos. These women confiscated wheat harvests, looted bread in shops, and kidnapped local officials. They want an even food supply. They hope the price of bread does not soar and everyone can eat properly.
The French Revolution then ended when King Louis XVI was sentenced to death by beheading. Kin Louis XVI death shows that the people have won. The government in the form of an absolute monarchy then changed to a government in the form of a republic.
Three Pioneers and Their Views in Gender Conservatism. The world has seen massive change when it comes to gender equality. However, traces of patriarchy are still prominent in today’s society even among younger generations. It is not difficult to see why that might be the case. For centuries, people have lived with such conservative philosophy. Many infamous philosophers had actually contributed to this point of view. You might be surprised to know that the three infamous Greek philosophers Aristotle, Hippocrates, and Plato are among the biggest contributors to this school of thought.
Plato is often said to be a pioneer in conservatism about gender. The philosopher had theorized about the creation of mankind which can still be read in several philosophy books. In his dadu online theory about human creation, it is very clear how Plato believed that women are less wholesome creations than men. He mentioned that women are not fully capable to think within reasons. Women are considered to have different characteristics (and therefore virtues). Thus, Plato said that reunion between man and woman is important to complete each other.
Plato’s opinions are adapted by his students and their followers.
Hippocrates, with his medical background, delved deeper into the physical difference between man and woman. It is clear that there is glaring anatomy difference between the two. Woman owns uterus and therefore capable of giving birth to new life. This ability was highlighted, but unfortunately not framed in fair manner. Hippocrates explained that giving birth is the ultimate way a woman can contribute to the society. This interpretation of woman’s nature affects how society treats women.
Aristotle’s view on gender roles was more related to political aspects of a society. He considered that women should be led by man because they are incapable of making sound decisions. Women are thought to be easily affected by their own emotions and can act impulsive. He did not think that it is necessary for women to receive similar education as men, a view that was dissimilar to Plato’s. However, he emphasized the importance of happiness for women too in order to build a utopian society. A society will not be able to thrive if its women are unhappy. Still, women are put in a lower power position than men.
Conservative gender philosophy from these philosophers really reflects the society.
Even in modern era. Wherever you live, you can easily see people who adopt “man as the ultimate leader” perspective. There are more male leaders than the females all around the globe, whether in government or corporate sector. Various issues stem from this particular discourse. Wage gap between men and women is something that is still present in modern society. Women notoriously receive less pay than men despite occupying similar positions and have equal qualifications. This philosophy is also reflected in the way that workplace regulations are not friendly towards women.
The philosophy itself became wide spreading to other regions due to occupancy. That is why the three philosophers and their view in gender conservatism become familiar to us. Changing mindsets that have been cultivated for years would be a difficult challenge. As the society continues to change and contest the old norms, though, the efforts to rethink old gender conservatism are encouraged.
Learning Conservatism Through Fictional Works of Famous Authors. Fictional literature world is continuously expanding as the era is progressing. Currently, there are more forms of fictional literature that people can enjoy. In the past, hardbound novels and textbooks were the two main ways for people to enjoy literary works. Nowadays, people can read digital magazines, fan fiction, or even posts on social media to get their daily literature dose. The essences within those works are also varied. Since freedom of contents is “hit” these days, you can easily find fictional literature works that break regular boundaries. Nonetheless, conservatism can still be found in literature.
What makes a literature considered to be conservative? It will be easier to understand the meaning of conservatism first. This particular philosophy emphasizes the application of traditional structure within the context of society. Such application encompasses various aspects in life: human relations, religions, political view, et cetera. The main objective of this philosophy is to achieve longevity and stability in the society. Conservative fictional literature will tend to have theme such as retribution and traditional social roles.
Does that mean that conservative fictions are not fun? That is totally incorrect.
You might not know this but the author of infamous Lord of the Rings series, J. R. R. Tolkien, was a conservative writer. His traditional philosophy could be seen clearly in his writings. He favored the quest of fundamental truths in his works. If you have read his novels, you might be able to see the conflicts between the inner and overt selves of his characters. In addition, Tolkien himself was a devout Catholic. Thus, he would introduce some religious themes into his novels.
Another famous writer slash conservative philosopher would be Nathaniel Hawthorne. He notoriously wrote The Scarlet Letter which becomes a must-read fictional work in various literature curriculums. Study of human natures in his works was rather prevalent. The author particularly highlighted the less desirable quality of human such as immorality, shame, and evil. You can see that the conflicts within oneself was apparent and that would be ended in a final resolution where redemption for those sins was made.
Female authors also provided significant contribution to the conservative fictional literature.
One of them is Flannery O’Connor whom throughout her life had written numerous novels and essays with her known style, Southern Gothic. You might expect a female traditional writer to have soft and feminine touch in her works. However, this author often depicted violent situations in which her characters were thrown into. In those difficult situations, the characters would face internal and external conflicts that would affect their lives forever. The common theme of her works would be acceptance of human natures. As an example, her work entitled The Violent Bear It Away ended with the main character accepting his fate as a prophet. The character then embarked on journey to fulfill that faith.
If you are interested in learning about conservatism but in interesting format, reading fictional works written by traditionalists would become an interesting experience. There are many other interesting writers from different periods whose works reflect conservative point of view.
The Differences between the Conservative and Revolutionary. These two terms sound interesting and relevant to be discussed in the national context. This term describes the nature and character of a change that is being carried out by a country. They are also becoming the model of the movement for change that is carried by each power and social-political group in a nation.
Conservatives are political attitudes and behaviors that do not want any meaningful (fundamental) change in a system. This attitude is usually adopted by those who are enjoying a privileged position of power in a structure or at least feel very benefited by the existing system. They are generally the financiers, authorities, lickers, and accomplices of a regime.
The conservatives are few but they are the dominant force in a country’s socio-political system. It is they who then control and run the state power system to reap profits and enjoy power.
To make their power last long, conservatives are more likely to maintain and preserve existing systems.
Even if they make changes because of insistence and outside encouragement by the opposition groups. They only want the changes not to completely shift or eliminate their position in power. Even then, the change is only possible if the situation is already. Very crisis and urgent which forces them to step down from positions of power.
That could have happened if the resistance movement was so strong, massive, and organized in a nation. Changes like this that have happened in this country when the new order regime was overthrown by the student movement supported by scholars and the masses of the people.
However, these changes have not brought significant changes to the life of bola 88 society and the progress of the nation until today. Because conservatives are back in power and are entrenched in our state system.
Unlike the conservative term, revolutionary is a situation of massive and fundamental changes in a constitutional system. So the revolutionaries are very at odds with those who are conservative. Revolutionaries are generally those who feel oppressed, exploited, and betrayed by rulers who are positioned as conservatives.
The revolutionaries are not only from the oppressed workers, peasants, and fishermen, but also intellectuals and middle class who have an ideological awareness to make fundamental changes in a system. Those who are intellectual and middle class have a strategic role to spearhead, organize, agitate, and encourage the masses in taking the fight.
It’s just that intellectual figures, scholars, and middle-class people are very rare in the socio-political context of our nation today. The intellectuals and middle-class people are now generally conservative, who only work as craftsmen, supporters, and even sycophants of the regime.
The intellectuals and revolutionary middle-class figures existed only in the history. Of our independence decades ago and the others are revolutionary figures from intellectuals. Scholars, and middle-class who want to fight the Dutch company to free the nation from the process of oppression and colonialism.
Such revolutionary figures have been lost in the life of our nation. What remains is only those who are pragmatic, opportunistic, and conservative. The generation of fighters as before seemed to be interrupted by the currents and changing times.
5 World’s Most Famous Conservative Leaders Today. There are several political ideologies in the world, they are Liberals, Conservatives, Centrists, and Communists. Today, there are many conservative world leaders. These leaders make policies that are quite anti-liberal and they are also very influential people in the world. They lead the big countries in the world so that everyone will be reluctant to them. Who are the 5 most conservative leaders in the world? Check these following reviews.
In the first position on this list is Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin is the president of the Russian state. Putin also just won back the Russian presidential election. Vladimir Putin was also named by Forbes to be the most influential leader in the world. He is a Conservative. Russia People’s Front which has the ideology of National Conservatism and Putinism. He has also issued various conservative policies and one of them is the anti-gay law which makes Russia one of the most assertive countries against Gay. Putin also makes relations between the state and the orthodox church get closer.
Next, we have Theresa May. Theresa May was the prime minister of the British empire. She came from and was also the leader of the British Conservative Party who had the ideology of conservatism. Theresa May was also a right-wing politician like Russia, the United States, and Austria. Britain is a country that is pro-LGBT and Muslim immigrants.
Next is Sebastian Kurz. Maybe this name is not so familiar to you Sebastian Kurz is the Chancellor of Austria. Kurz is the youngest world leader because at the age of only 31, he becomes Chancellor and at the age of 27 he has become the foreign minister. young European leaders are usually liberal, but Kurz is different because he is a Conservative. He is from the Austrian People’s Party which has the ideology of Christian Democracy and Conservatism. Sebastian Kurz also made various Conservative policies such as anti-immigration policies, restricting refugees, and anti-Islamic policies such as stopping mosque funding.
Angela Merkel is a German Chancellor (like Prime Minister / Vice President). Angela Merkel has been a German Chancellor since 2005 or has been 13 years. Although Merkel is conservative, the German state does not immediately become Conservative at poker uang asli because the President, Frank Walter is a centrist – liberal (center right) which makes Germany finally legalize LGBT marriages that were previously not legalized.
Donald Trump is the president of the United States. Donald Trump is also a politician from the Republican Party who has the National Conservatism ideology. Trump is also included in the ranks of the most conservative president in the US. Trump also issued various conservative policies aimed at returning the US to a conservative country as before led by Obama because, during Obama’s leadership, many liberal policies imposed by Obama were not in accordance with the values of US conservatism. Some of Trump’s policies were anti-abortion policies, tax cuts, and rejecting LGBT. In this Trump era, he also promised to restore Christian power to America as it should.